ClassificationMachine Learningscikit-learnStochastic signal analysis

Machine Learning with Signal Processing Techniques


Stochastic Signal Analysis is a field of science concerned with the processing, modification and analysis of (stochastic) signals.

Anyone with a background in Physics or Engineering knows to some degree about signal analysis techniques, what these technique are and how they can be used to analyze, model and classify signals.

Data Scientists coming from a different fields, like Computer Science or Statistics, might not be aware of the analytical power these techniques bring with them.

In this blog post, we will have a look at how we can use Stochastic Signal Analysis techniques, in combination with traditional Machine Learning Classifiers for accurate classification and modelling of time-series and signals.

At the end of the blog-post you should be able understand the various signal-processing techniques which can be used to retrieve features from signals and be able to classify ECG signals (and even identify a person by their ECG signal), predict seizures from EEG signals, classify and identify targets in radar signals, identify patients with neuropathy or myopathyetc from EMG signals by using the FFT, etc etc.


In this blog-post we’ll discuss the following topics:

  1. Basics of Signals
  2. Transformations between time- and frequency-domain by means of FFT, PSD and autocorrelation.
  3. Statistical parameter estimation and feature extraction
    1. Example dataset: Classification of human activity
    2. Extracting features from all signals in the training and test set
  4. Classification with (traditional) Scikit-learn classifiers
  5. Finals words




1. Basics of  Signals

1.1 Signals vs Time-Series

You might often have come across the words time-series and signals describing datasets and it might not be clear what the exact difference between them is.

In a time-series dataset the to-be-predicted value (y) is a function of time (y = y(t)). Such a function can describe anything,  from the value of bitcoin or a specific stock over time, to fish population over time. A signal is a more general version of this where the dependent variable y does not have to a function of time;  it can be a function of spatial coordinates (y = y(x, y)), distance from the source ( y = y(r) ), etc etc.

Signals can come in many different forms and shapes: you can think of audio signals, pictures, video signals, geophysical signals (seismic data), sonar and radar data and medical signals (EEG, ECG, EMG).

  • A picture can be seen as a signal which contains information about the brightness of the three colors (RGB) across the two spatial dimensions.
  • Sonar signals give information about an acoustic pressure field as a function of time and the three spatial dimensions.
  • Radar signals do the same thing for electromagnetic waves.

In essence, almost anything can be interpreted as a signal as long as it carries information within itself.




1.2 Discrete Time Signals

If you open up a text book on Signal Processing it will usually be divided into two parts: the continuous time-domain and the discrete-time domain.

The difference is that Continuous signals have an independent variable which is (as the name suggests) continuous in nature, i.e. it is present at each time-step within its domain. No matter how far you ‘zoom in’, you will have a value at that time step; at t = 0.1 s, at t = 0.1435 s, at t = 0.1435297 s, etc etc.

Discrete-time signals are discrete and are only defined at specific time-steps. For example, if the period of a discrete signal is 0.1 s, it will be defined at t = 0.1 s, t = 0.2 s, t = 0.3 s, etc … (but not at t = 0.143 s).

Most of the signals you come across in nature are analog (continuous); think of the electrical signals in your body, human speech, any other sound you hear, the amount of light measured during the day, barometric pressure, etc etc.

Whenever you want to digitize one of these analog signals in order to analyze and visualize it on a computer, it becomes discrete. Since we will only be concerning ourselves with digital signals in this blog-post, we will only look at the discrete version of the various stochastic signal analysis techniques.


Digitizing an analog signal is usually done by sampling it with a specific sampling rate. In Figure 1 we can see a signal sampled at different frequencies.


Figure 1. A continuous signal sampled at different frequencies. When the signal is sampled at a sampling rate which is too low, the digital signal no longer correctly represents the analog signal.


As we can see, it is important to choose a good sampling rate; if the sampling rate is chosen too low, the discrete signal will no longer contain the characteristics of the original analog signal and important features defining the signal are lost.

To be more specific, a signal is said to be under-sampled if the sampling rate is smaller than the Nyquist rate. The Nyquist rate is twice the highest frequency present in the signal.
Under-sampling a signal can lead to effects like aliasing [2] and the wagon-wheel effect (see video). To prevent undersampling usually a frequency much higher than the Nyquist rate is chosen as the sampling frequency.



1.3 Periodic Signals and the Fourier Transform

If the signal contains a pattern, which repeats itself after a specific period of time, we call it an periodic signal.
The time it takes for an periodic signal to repeat itself is called the period P (and the distance it travels in this period is called the wavelength \lambda).

The frequency f is the inverse of the Period; if a signal has a Period of 1 s, its frequency is 1 Hz, and if the period is 10 s, the frequency is 0.1 Hz.


The period, wavelength and frequency are related to each other via formula (1):
f = \frac{1}{P} = \frac{s}{\lambda}         (1)
where s is the speed of sound.




2. Transformations between time- and frequency-domain (FFT, PSD, wavelet)

Fourier analysis is a field of study used to analyze the periodicity in (periodic) signals. If a signal contains components which are periodic in nature, Fourier analysis can be used to decompose this signal in its periodic components. Fourier analysis tells us at what the frequency of these periodical component are.

For example, if we measure your heart beat and at the time of measurement you have a heart rate of 60 beats / minute, the signal will have a frequency of 1 Hz (Period of 1 S = frequency of 1 Hz). If you are doing at the same time, some repetitive task where you move your fingers every two seconds, the signal going to you hand will have a frequency of 0.5 Hz (Period of 2 S = frequency of 0.5 Hz). An electrode placed on your arm, will measure the combination of these two signals. And a Fourier analysis performed on the combined signals, will show us a peak in the frequency spectrum at 0.5 Hz and one at 1 Hz.

So, two (or more) different signals (with different frequencies, amplitudes, etc) can be mixed together to form a new composite signal. The new signal then consists of all of its component signals.

The reverse is also true, every signal – no matter how complex it looks – can be decomposed into a sum of its simpler signals. These simpler signals are trigonometric functions (sine and cosine waves). This was discovered (in 1822) by Joseph Fourier and it is what Fourier analysis is about. The mathematical function which transform a signal from the time-domain to the frequency-domain is called the Fourier Transform, and the function which does the opposite is called the Inverse Fourier Transform.

If you want to know how the Fourier transform works, 3blue1brown’s beautifully animated explanation will hopefully give you more insight.


Below, we can see this in action. We have five sine-waves (blue signals) with amplitudes 4, 6, 8, 10 and 14 and frequencies 6.5, 5, 3, 1.5 and 1 Hz. By combining these signals we form a new composite signal (black). The Fourier Transform transforms this signal to the frequency-domain (red signal) and shows us at which frequencies the component signals oscillate.




Figure 2. A signal (black) consisting of multiple component signals (blue) with different frequencies (red).



The Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) is an efficient algorithm for calculating the Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) and is the de facto standard to calculate a Fourier Transform. It is present in almost any scientific computing libraries and packages, in every programming language.

Nowadays the Fourier transform is an indispensable mathematical tool used in almost every aspect of our daily lives. In the next section we will have a look at how we can use the FFT and other Stochastic Signal analysis techniques to classify time-series and signals.




2.1 The FFT in Python

In Python, the FFT of a signal can be calculate with the SciPy library.
Below, we can see how we can use SciPy to calculate the FFT of the composite signal above, and retrieve the frequency values of its component signals.

Figure 3. The FFT of our composite signal transforms it from the Time-domain to the Frequency Domain


Since our signal is sampled at a rate f_s of 100 Hz, the FFT will return the frequency spectrum up to a frequency of f_s / 2 = 50 Hz. The higher your sampling rate is, the higher the maximum frequency is FFT can calculate.

In the get_fft_values function above, the scipy.fftpack.fft function returns a vector of complex valued frequencies. Since they are complex valued, they will contain a real and an imaginary part. The real part of the complex value corresponds with the magnitude, and the imaginary part with the phase of the signal. Since we are only interested in the magnitude of the amplitudes, we use np.abs() to take the real part of the frequency spectrum.

The FFT of an input signal of N points, will return an vector of N points. The first half of this vector (N/2 points) contain the useful values  of the frequency spectrum from 0 Hz up to the Nyquist frequency of f_s / 2. The second half contains the complex conjugate and can be disregarded since it does not provide any useful information.




2.2 The PSD in Python

Closely related to the Fourier Transform is the concept of Power Spectral Density.

Similar to the FFT, it describes the frequency spectrum of a signal. But in addition to the FFT it also takes the power distribution at each frequency (bin) into account. Generally speaking the locations of the peaks in the frequency spectrum will be the same as in the FFT-case, but the height and width of the peaks will differ. The surface below the peaks corresponds with the power distribution at that frequency.

Calculation of the Power Spectral density is a bit easier, since SciPy contain a function which not only return a vector of amplitudes, but also a vector containing the tick-values of the frequency-axis.


Figure 4. The PSD of our composite signal.

2.3 Calculating the auto-correlation in Python

The auto-correlation function calculates the correlation of a signal with a time-delayed version of itself. The idea behind it is that if a signal contain a pattern which repeats itself after a time-period of \tau seconds, there will be a high correlation between the signal and a \tau sec delayed version of the signal.

Unfortunately there is no standard function to calculate the auto-correlation of a function in SciPy.  But we can make one ourselves using the correlate() function of numpy. Our function returns the correlation value, as a function of the time-delay \tau. Naturally, this time-delay can not be more than the full length of the signal (which is in our case 2.56 sec).



Figure 5. The autocorrelation of our composite function.


Converting the values of the auto-correlation peaks from the time-domain to the frequency domain should result in the same peaks as the ones calculated by the FFT. The frequency of a signal thus can be found with the auto-correlation as well as with the FFT.
However, because it is more precise, the FFT is almost always used for frequency detection.

Fun fact: the auto-correlation and the PSD are Fourier Transform pairs, i.e. the PSD can be calculated by taking the FFT of the auto-correlation function, and the auto-correlation can be calculated by taking the Inverse Fourier Transform of the PSD function.



2.4 The Wavelet Transform

One transform which we have not mentioned here is the Wavelet transform. It transform a signal into its frequency domain, just like the Fourier Transform.

The difference is: the Fourier Transform has a very high resolution in the frequency domain, and zero resolution in the time domain; we know at which frequencies the signal oscillates, but not at which time these oscillations occur. The output of a Wavelet transform hash a high resolution in the frequency domain and also in the time domain; it maintains information about the time-domain.

The wavelet transform is better suited for analyzing signals with a dynamic frequency spectrum, i.e. the frequency spectrum changes over time, or has a component with a different frequency localized in time (the frequency changes abruptly for a short period of time).

Lets have a look at how to use the wavelet transform in Python in the next blog-post. For the ones who can not wait to get started with it, here are some examples of applications using the wavelet transform.




3. Statistical parameter estimation and feature extraction

We have seen three different ways to calculate characteristics of signals using the FFT, PSD and the autocorrelation function. These functions transform a signal from the time-domain to the frequency-domain and give us its frequency spectrum.

After we have transformed a signal to the frequency-domain, we can extract features from each of these transformed signals and use these features as input in standard classifiers like Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosting or Support Vector Machines.

Which features can we extract from these transformations? A good first step is the value of the frequencies at which oscillations occur and the corresponding amplitudes. In other words; the x and y-position of the peaks in the frequency spectrum.
SciPy contains some methods to find the relative maxima (argrelmax) and minima (argrelmin) in data, but I found the peak detection method of Marcos Duarte much simpler and easier to use.

Armed with this peak-finding function, we can calculate the FFT, PSD and the auto-correlation of each signal and use the x and y coordinates of the peaks as input for our classifier. This is illustrated in Figure 6.

Figure 6. The location of the peaks in the FFT, PSD and autocorrelation can be used as features for our classifier.


3.1 Example dataset: Classification of human activity

Lets have a look at how we can classify the signals in the Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphones Data Set. This dataset contains measurements done by 30 people between the ages of 19 to 48. The measurements are done with a smartphone placed on the waist while doing one of the following six activities:

  • walking,
  • walking upstairs,
  • walking downstairs,
  • sitting,
  • standing or
  • laying.

The measurements are done at a constant rate of 50 Hz. After filtering out the noise, the signals are cut in fixed-width windows of 2.56 sec with an overlap of 1.28 sec. Each signal will therefore have 50 x 2.56 = 128 samples in total. This is illustrated in Figure 7a.

The smartphone measures three-axial linear body acceleration, three-axial linear total acceleration and three-axial angular velocity. So per measurement, the total signal consists of nine components (see Figure 7b).


Figure 7a. A plot of the first components (body acceleration measured in the x-direction) of the signal.
Figure 7b. A 3D plot of the nine different components of a signal.


The dataset is already splitted into a training and a test part, so we can immediately load the signals into an numpy ndarray.


We have loaded the training set into a ndarray of size (7352, 128, 9) and the test set into a ndarray of size (2947, 128, 9). As you can guess from the dimensions, the number of signals in the training set is 7352 and the number of signals in the test set is 2947. And each signal in the training and test set has a length of 128 samples and 9 different components.


Below, we will visualize the signal itself with its nine components, the FFT, the PSD and auto-correlation of the components, together with the peaks present in each of the three transformations.


That is a lot of code! But if you strip away the parts of the code to give the plot a nice layout, you can see it basically consists of two for loops which apply the different transformations to the nine components of the signal and subsequently finds the peaks in the resulting frequency spectrum. The transformation is plotted with a line-plot and the found peaks are plot with a scatter-plot.

The result can be seen in Figure 8.


Figure 8. The nine different components of a signal, together with the FFT, PSD and autocorrelation function applied to these components.



3.2 Extracting features from all signals in the training and test set

In Figure 8, we have already shown how to extract features from a signal: transform a signal by means of the FFT, PSD or autocorrelation function and locate the peaks in the transformation with the peak-finding function.

We have already seen how to do that for one signal, so now simply need to iterate through all signals in the dataset.



This process results in a matrix containing the features of the training set, and a matrix containing the features of the test set. The number rows of these matrices should be equal to the number of signals in each set (7352 and 2947).

The number of columns in each matrix depend on depends on your choice of features. Each signal has nine components, and for each component you can calculate either just the FFT or all three of the transformations. For each transformation you can decide to look at the first n peaks in the signal. And for each peak you can decide to take only the x value, or both the x and y values. In the example above, we have taken the x and y values of the first 5 peaks of each transform, so we have 270 columns (9*3*5*2) in total.



4. Classification with (traditional) Scikit-learn classifiers

After constructing the matrices for the training and the test set, together with a list of the correct labels, we can use the scikit-learn package to construct a classifier.



As you can see, we were able to classify these signals with quite a high accuracy. The accuracy of the training set is about 1 and the accuracy on the test set is about 0.91.

To achieve this accuracy we did not even have to break a sweat. The feature selection was done fully automatic; for each transformation we selected the x and y component of the first five peaks (or use the default value of zero).

It is understandable that some of the 270 features will be more informative than other ones. It could be that some transformations of some components do not have five peaks, or that the frequency value of the peaks is more informative than the amplitude value, or that the FFT is always more informative than the auto-correlation.

The accuracy will increase even more if we actively select the features, transformations and components which are important for classification. Maybe we can even choose a different classifier or play around with its parameter values (hyperparameter optimization) to achieve a higher accuracy.



5. Finals Words

The field of stochastic signal analysis provides us with a set of powerful tools which can be used to analyze, model and classify time-series and signals. I hope this blog-post has provided you with some information on how to use these techniques.

If you found this blog useful feel free to share it with other people and with your fellow Data Scientists. If you think something is missing feel free to leave a comment below!


PS: Did you notice we did not use a Recurrent Neural Net ? 🙂 What kind of accuracy can you achieve on this dataset with a RNN?

PS2: The code is also available as a Jupyter notebook on my GitHub account.


Share This:

47 gedachten over “Machine Learning with Signal Processing Techniques

  1. Interesting article! I just run into a glitch, though. I tried running the code in Jupyter Notebook and this happens:

    —-> y=np.array([frequencies[ii]]*length)
    IndexError: list index out of range

    Can’t figure out why (might be that I’m doing something wrong).

    1. It looks like the number of iterations in your loop is longer than the number of frequencies in the list.
      Try limiting the loop number to len(frequencies).

  2. Great post! but one question!
    Why is the denominator = 10? would you like to explain shortly what this row of code actually do please!
    mph = signal_min + (signal_max – signal_min)/denominator

    1. The value for ‘minimum peak height’ is 10% of the maximum value of the signal. If there is any peak-like behavior in the signal smaller than this value, it gets ignored.
      This percentage of course depends on the signal itself, but you usually you dont want to take small fluctuations in the frequency spectrum into consideration.

  3. Hey Ahmet, thank you for that great post and effort! I’ve got a question regarding the mph you’re calculating in section 3.2. As far as I understood your comment, the mph is the minimum peak height in the frequency-domain, right? Because in section 3.2 you’re calculating it for the “signal”, which is the raw/filtered data in the time-domain. In section 3.1 line 59 (2. code block) the inputs (y_values) for mph are the results obtained from value_retriever. And these are the x_values and y_values (frequency and amplitude) from the get_fft,get_psd,… functions, which are in the frequency-domain. Did I get here something wrong?
    Another question I have regards the normalization of the data. As far as i’ve seen you did not perform any kind of data normalization. Is the dataset already normalized/standardized or is there any particular reason you left that out? If not, what kind of standardization would you recommend?
    Best regards and keep up the good work!

    1. Hi Philipp,
      Thanks for the comment!
      In regards to mph, you didn’t get anything wrong… it is one of the arguments of the peak finding method. This method can be applied to any signal, whether the signal is a time-dependent signal or a frequency-dependent signal. I am simply disregarding any peaks below a certain percentage of the maximum amplitude in the signal, since they are more likely to be the result of noise than actual information.
      In regards to the normalization part. I have never experienced that normalizing (scaling to [0 – 1]) the input values of a (gradient boosting) classifier improves the accuracy. I don’t think it is necessary. Usually it is more of a recommendation.
      I would pay more attention to normalizing if there the input values had very different scales (one column with values in the scale of 1E-3 and one column with values in the scale of 1E6 for example), and the distance between points is important for the algorithm (algorithms like k-Nearest neighbours).

  4. Hello. Kudos to the impressive article. I have a doubt about Wavelet transform. I am trying to figure out the wavelet of a continuous uniform sampled time series data. I tried it with ‘scipy cwt’ and also with ‘pycwt’. They give different results. Have you come across this problem?

  5. Amazing work! I tried to run the code, but it showed an invalid syntax error in this function:
    def get_first_n_peaks(x,y,no_peaks=5):
    x_, y_ = list(x), list(y)
    if len(x_) >= no_peaks:
    what happen here “>=”?

  6. Hi,
    Nice post, thanks. In the blog, it is written that;
    ” The real part of the complex value corresponds with the magnitude, and the imaginary part with the phase of the signal. Since we are only interested in the magnitude of the amplitudes, we use np.abs() to take the real part of the frequency spectrum.”

    This information is wrong actually, magnitude of a complex number is square root of the sum of the squares of real and imaginary parts. np.abs() calculates this.

    1. What I would do first is to see if one of the components x,y or z is significantly more important than the other two. If that is the case you can already reduce the no of components from three to one.
      After that, calculate a bunch of features from the FFT and see which feature has the most importance and pick that one if you really can only pick one.
      You could also calculate the PSD and see if there are specific frequency values (PSD_x) for which the PSD amplitude (PSD_y) is really important for your classification problem.

  7. Thanks for the quick answer.
    I need all the 3-components data, one solution is to use SVD to decompose it to 1D (Is it a good solution?). I need only one frequency feature for a given seconds of data (say 2-seconds of data) of the 1D signal. So, should I take the max_peak bin#? but it gives me an index number. Is it the given frequency feature?

    1. Hi Khan,
      There does seem to be some literature on using SVD or PCA for reducing triaxial signals to 1D. (See DOI: 10.1049/el.2018.6117 and DOI: 10.1190/1.1443068 ), but you could also try to calculate the resultant vector ( r = sqrt(x^2 + y^2 + z^2) ).
      Whether you want the x-component of the frequency spectrum (frequency value) or the y-component (amplitude value) really depends on the specific problem at hand. Do the different classes of signals have a peak at the same frequency, but of different amplitude, or do they have peaks with the same amplitude but at different frequencies?
      You can also try to use the PSD instead of the FFT, which has a more smooth frequency spectrum.

  8. Thanks again for your valuable comments. Yes, I need only one frequency feature for a two seconds window, to replace somehow the zero-crossing feature (which is the frequency feature regardless of the amplitude).

    1. 這是帶有matplotlib的簡單3d圖。 我不再有確切的代碼,但是您可以在此處找到一些示例:


  9. H i i am using LSTM to detect myocardial infarction in the PTB ecg signals available from physionet.
    here is the blog post that i am used for this task
    however i used the 2048 samples as my features and 15 channels as the time stamp for the data.
    i want to know how to downsample the data when there is 15 channel involved in the data?

  10. hello sir
    I have collected data using smartphone i want label the data according two types normal and abnormal movement
    could you help my how can i label the output and how can i filter the noise

    Thank you

  11. Thank you very much for this great contribution to knowledge.
    From this first code, I am getting this error:
    NameError: name ‘get_fft_values’ is not defined
    Do let me know why!!

  12. HELLO SIR,Thank you for sharing your knowledge !!!
    I am working on a similar project but the sensor is different . I get the reading from arduino UNO ADC. How can i obtain a desired sample rate and a fixed duration sample(like ,here each waveform had a duration of 2.56sec and was sampled at a rate f_s = 50Hz )

    1. Hi Prabhu,
      You can only obtain that information from the manual of the specific hardware / sensor you are using.
      But to obtain the frequency spectrum, you can also fill in a dummy value for the sample rate. Lets say you fill in f_s = 1.
      The frequency values in the frequency spectrum then will no longer be correct, but the overal frequency spectrum will be.

  13. Hi, this is great. However, I’m having trouble here an “axes don’t match” error here:
    for input_file in INPUT_FILES_TRAIN:
    signal = read_signals(INPUT_FOLDER_TRAIN + input_file)
    train_signals = np.transpose(np.array(train_signals), (1, 2, 0))

    for input_file in INPUT_FILES_TEST:
    signal = read_signals(INPUT_FOLDER_TEST + input_file)
    test_signals = np.transpose(np.array(test_signals), (1, 2, 0))

  14. Could you please let me know if the files which you have used: INPUT_FILES_TRAIN = [‘body_acc_x_train.txt’, ‘body_acc_y_train.txt’, ‘body_acc_z_train.txt’,.. is available in github.?

  15. Hi,
    Finally after struggling for couple of days, I found a right technical blog. Thanks for sharing.

    I am working with accelerometer data (I have ML and DL understanding) and completely new to signal processing domain i.e. FFT and Wavelet etc. I am trying “Count a device movement using Accelerometer data”. It would be great if you can help me with your expertise. Basically, I am trying to solve this problem (kindly look at stackoverflow question):

    Please share your views and suggestions!

  16. Hi Ahmet,

    This is an excellent blog! Thank you for sharing valuable insights on signal processing. Appreciate your efforts.

    I’m working on a similar problem of human activity recognition using smartphone accelerometer data. The data contains tri-axial signals only from accelerometer around x, y, z axes. The training data for signals and labels has been separately provided with different shape and sampling frequencies for both. The signals data is sampled at 10 Hz (0.1 seconds per sample) and contains total 3744 samples and 3 components. Whereas, labels data is sampled at 1 Hz (1 second per sample) and contains 375 samples. In other words, labels are provided for every 10th observation in signals data. Signals and labels can be joined using timestamp.

    My approach: The above suggests that each labeled signal has 10 signal samples. Assuming this, I transformed the signals dataframe of shape (3744, 3) into a numpy array of shape (375, 10, 3). I extracted 90 features using frequency transformations with signal parameters T = 0.1 sec, N = 10, f_s = 1 Hz. I also extracted 72 wavelet features from the signals. I combined both frequecy and wavelet domain features to train a classifier that classifies signals into four activities – standing (7% samples), walking (57%), stairs down (12%), stairs up (23%).

    Results: The classifier fits training data with 100% accuracy. However, the test score is not satisfactory (30-40%) which signifies overfitting. Also classifier does not classify standing activity at all and predictions are remaining three classes.

    I have ran multiple iterations, but not able to reach reasonable test accuracy. It will be great if you could share any inputs to – 1) review my approach, 2) validate the signal parameters used for frequency transformation, and 3) anything I’m missing or any alternative approach to improve the test score.

    Regret long post. Thanks in advance for your response.

  17. Great article, thank you!
    The definition for “detect_peaks” function is missing from the code, and thus it’s not reusable.. can you please supply it?

  18. Great work, thanks for that. I wonder if you could elaborate on the matrix in Section 3. Statistical parameter estimation and feature extraction based on fft, psd, AR. Thanks.

  19. Hi, thanks for the great lecturing over feautre fininding. I am running your codes for “def detect_peaks” but the system does not recognize the command _plot. Would you elaborate on this how to fix it? Thank you !

Geef een antwoord

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd.